Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board
Significance
Petitioner
Communist Party of the United States of America
Respondent
Subversive Activities Control Board
Petitioner's Claim
That provisions of the 1950 Internal Security Act (the McCarran Act) requiring Communist organizations to register with the attorney general are unconstitutional either as bills of attainder, imposing punishment without benefit of trial, or as violations of the First Amendment.
Chief Lawyers for Petitioner
John J. Abt and Joseph Forer
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
J. Lee Rankin, U.S. Solicitor General
Justices for the Court
Tom C. Clark, Felix Frankfurter (writing for the Court), John Marshall Harlan II, Potter Stewart, Charles Evans Whittaker
Justices Dissenting
Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr., William O. Douglas, Earl Warren
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
5 June 1961
Decision
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the registration requirement.
Related Cases
- Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298 (1957).
- Aptheker v. Secretary of State, 378 U.S. 500 (1964).
- Albertson v. SACB, 382 U.S. 70 (1965).
- United States v. Robel, 389 U.S. 258 (1967).
Further Readings
- Abernathy, M. Glenn. The Right of Assembly and Association, 2nd ed. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1981.
- Caute, David. The Great Fear: The Anti-Communist Purge Under Truman and Eisenhower. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1977.
- Haynes, John Earl. Red Scare or Red Menace?: American Communism and Anticommunism in the Cold War Era. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1966.
Additional topics
- Draper v. United States - Significance, Informant Provided "reasonable Grounds", Dissent Says Arrest Unlawful, Impact, Related Cases
- Clarence Earl Gideon Trials: 1961 1963 - Gideon Appeals
- Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board - Significance
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1954 to 1962