Brief for Appellants
Appeal From The United States District Court For The District Of Kansasbrief For Appellants
WILLIAM T. COLEMAN JR.,
GEORGE E. C. HAYES,
GEORGE M. JOHNSON,
WILLIAM R. MING JR.,
CONSTANCE BAKER MOTLEY,
JAMES M. NABRIT JR.,
FRANK D. REEVES,
JOHN SCOTT,
JACK B. WEINSTEIN, of Counsel.
ROBERT L. CARTER,
THURGOOD MARSHALL,
SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON III,
CHARLES S. SCOTT,
Counsel for Appellants.
Table of Contents
Opinion Below
Jurisdiction
Questions Presented
The Law of Kansas and the Statute Involved
Statement of the Case
Specifications of Error
Summary of Argument
Argument
- The State of Kansas in affording opportunities for elementary education to its citizens has no power under the Constitution of the United States to impose racial restrictions and distinctions
- The court below, having found that appellants were denied equal educational opportunities by virtue of the segregated school system, erred in denying the relief prayed
Conclusion
Additional topics
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1941 to 1953Brief for Appellants - Appeal From The United States District Court For The District Of Kansasbrief For Appellants, Questions Presented - In the Supreme Court of the United States October Term (1952), OPINION BELOW, JURISDICTION