less than 1 minute read

Scott v. Illinois

Significance

The ruling clarified the Court's reasoning with regard to provision of legal counsel to indigent criminal defendants as outlined in Argersinger v. Hamlin, (1972). In Argersinger the Court had ruled that a state must provide legal counsel to indigent criminal defendants potentially subject to prison terms of not greater than six months. Scott v. Illinois limited a state's obligation to provide legal counsel to indigent defendants to those cases in which a sentence of imprisonment was imposed.

Additional topics

Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980Scott v. Illinois - Significance, An Open-and-shut Case?, Legal Precedents, Interpreting Argersinger, Impact