Northern Pipeline Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
Significance, Three Acceptable Categories, Bankruptcy
Northern Pipeline Co.
Marathon Pipe Line Co.
That an appellate court ruling that non-Article III bankruptcy courts are unconstitutional should be dismissed.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
John L. Devney
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Melvin I. Orenstein
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr. (writing for the Court), Thurgood Marshall, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens
Warren E. Burger, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., Byron R. White
Date of Decision
28 June 1982
That Article I federal bankruptcy courts were unconstitutional.
- Ex parte Bakelite Corp., 279 U.S. 438 (1929).
- Toth v. Quarles, 350 U.S. 11 (1955).
- Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962).
- Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530 (1962).
- Buckley v. Valeo, 42 U.S. 1 (1976).
- Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448 (1980).
West's Encyclopedia of American Law St. Paul, MN: West Group, 1998.
- American Bar Association Journal, September 1982.
- Brooklyn Law Review, winter 1983, p. 207.
- Harvard Law Review, November 1982, p. 257.
- Land and Water Review, Vol. 18, p. 313.
- O'Connor v. Ortega - Significance, Search And Seizure Without Authorization, What Is The Right To Privacy In The Workplace?
- Nollan v. California Coastal Commission - Significance, Mr. And Mrs. Nollan Build Their Dream Home, Limits On The State's Power To Take
- Northern Pipeline Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. - Significance
- Northern Pipeline Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. - Three Acceptable Categories
- Northern Pipeline Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. - Bankruptcy
- Other Free Encyclopedias