Champion v. Ames
Significance, An Element Confessedly Injurious To The Public Morals, Suppression Of Lotteries Is A Power Of The States
Charles F. Champion
John C. Ames
That a federal statute prohibiting the carrying of lottery tickets across state lines was unconstitutional.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Beck, Assistant Attorney General
Justices for the Court
Henry Billings Brown, John Marshall Harlan I (writing for the Court), Oliver Wendell Holmes, Joseph McKenna, Edward Douglass White
David Josiah Brewer, Melville Weston Fuller, Rufus Wheeler Peckham, George Shiras, Jr.
Date of Decision
23 February 1903
Lottery tickets were traffic and carrying them from one state to another was interstate commerce. Under its power to regulate commerce among the states, Congress could prohibit the carrying of lottery tickets from state to state.
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States, 175 U.S. 211 (1899).
- Hanley v. Kansas City S. R. Co., 187 U.S. 617 (1903).
- Charles Becker Trials: 1912-14 - Becker Runs Crime Ring From Within Police Department, Tried Before New York's Hanging Judge
- Captain William Van Schaick Trial: 1906 - Only Van Schaick Is Tried, Suggestions For Further Reading
- Champion v. Ames - Further Readings
- Champion v. Ames - Significance
- Champion v. Ames - An Element Confessedly Injurious To The Public Morals
- Champion v. Ames - Suppression Of Lotteries Is A Power Of The States
- Champion v. Ames - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1883 to 1917