et al. Glidden Company v. Zdanok
Significance, Management Rights Vs. Seniority, Ruling On The Judge, Article I And Article Iii
Durkee Famous Foods Division of the Glidden Company
Zdanok, et al.
That the original ruling against Durkee was improperly constituted because a U.S. Court of Claims judge, rather than a Circuit Court judge, had sat on the court when it heard the case.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Justices for the Court
William J. Brennan, Jr., Tom C. Clark, Arthur Goldberg, John Marshall Harlan II (writing for the Court), Potter Stewart, Earl Warren, Byron R. White
Hugo Lafayette Black, William O. Douglas
Date of Decision
25 June 1962
That the U.S. Court of Claims judge had been entitled to sit on the circuit court case; the Court refused to consider any other aspect of the case, letting stand the circuit court judgment that workers from a closed-down plant did indeed have seniority rights at the next new plant that the company opened.
- Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 14 U.S. 304 (1816).
- Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946).
- Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962).
- Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465 (1976).
- Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1987).
- Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 1051 (1996).
- "Agency Shop Ban Is Left Standing." New York Times, October 10, 1961, p. 85.
- Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt, eds. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1996.
- "High Court Bars Review of Case on Job Seniority."New York Times, October 9, 1962, p. 30.
- Gomillion v. Lightfoot - Background, Supreme Court Reverses Decision, Redistricting
- Engel v. Vitale - Further Readings
- et al. Glidden Company v. Zdanok - Significance
- et al. Glidden Company v. Zdanok - Management Rights Vs. Seniority
- et al. Glidden Company v. Zdanok - Ruling On The Judge
- et al. Glidden Company v. Zdanok - Article I And Article Iii
- et al. Glidden Company v. Zdanok - What Protection Does A Judge Need?
- Other Free Encyclopedias