Pollock v. Williams
Significance, Emanuel Pollock's $5 Debt
H. T. Williams
That a Florida law regarding the failure to perform labor after receiving an advance was unconstitutional, under the Thirteenth Amendment.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Raymer R. Maguire
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
John C. Wynn
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black, William O. Douglas, Felix Frankfurter, Robert H. Jackson (writing for the Court), Frank Murphy, Owen Josephus Roberts, Wiley Blount Rutledge
Stanley Forman Reed, Harlan Fiske Stone
Date of Decision
10 April 1944
Upheld appellant's claim.
- Bailey v. Alabama, 219 U.S. 219 (1911).
- Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927).
- Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt, eds. Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1997.
- Elliott, Stephen P., ed. A Reference Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court. New York: Facts on File Publications, 1986.
- Hall, Kermit L., ed. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. New York: Oxford Press, 1992.
- New York Times, April 11, 1944.
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Pullman Company - Significance, Race, Economics, And State Law, The Abstention Doctrine Since Pullman
- D. Kansas Opinion of U.S. District Court August (3,) (1951) - How To Use Milestones In The Law, This Case In History, Brown V. Board Of Education Of Topeka - ISSUE, MATERIALS
- Pollock v. Williams - Significance
- Pollock v. Williams - Emanuel Pollock's $5 Debt
- Other Free Encyclopedias