In Re Debs
Significance, The "debs Rebellion", Debs Tried For Conspiracy, Debs' Political Career Continued
Eugene V. Debs
Contempt of court and conspiracy.
John C. Black, T. M. Milchrist, Edwin Walker
Chief Defense Lawyers
Clarence Darrow, S. Gregory, Lyman Trumbull
Peter Grosscup, William A. Woods
Date of Decision
12 February 1895
Guilty of contempt, no verdict on conspiracy.
- Northern Securities Co. v. United States, 193 U.S. 197 (1904).
- Patton v. United States, 281 U.S. 276 (1930).
- Nebbia v. New York, 291 U.S. 502 (1934).
- Ex Parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942).
West's Encyclopedia of American Law. Minneapolis, Minnesota: West Publishing, 1998.
- In Re Debs: 1895 - The "debs Rebellion", Debs Tried For Conspiracy, Debs' Political Career Continued
- Hurtado v. California - Significance, The Right To Be Indicted, "ancient Established Law", "incapable Of Progress Or Improvement"
- In Re Debs - Further Readings
- In Re Debs - Significance
- In Re Debs - The "debs Rebellion"
- In Re Debs - Debs Tried For Conspiracy
- In Re Debs - Debs' Political Career Continued
- In Re Debs - Contempt Of Court
- Other Free Encyclopedias