Calder v. Bull
The Facts Of The Case, High Court Rules
Mr. and Mrs. Calder
Mr. and Mrs. Caleb Bull
That Connecticut legislation granting a rehearing of a probate dispute violated the Constitution's prohibition of ex post facto laws.
Justices for the Court
Samuel Chase (writing for the Court), William Cushing, James Iredell, William Paterson
None (Oliver Ellsworth and James Wilson did not participate)
Date of Decision
8 August 1798
Connecticut's legislation was not a constitutional violation because the ex post factoprovision applies only to criminal cases.
The Supreme Court's decision in Calder v. Bull changed the course of American jurisprudence by eliminating consideration of ex post facto violations in civil cases.
The Supreme Court's decision in Calder v. Bull had a substantial impact on legal history. As a consequence of this decision, individuals deprived of vested property rights could no longer cite the ex post facto prohibition in their argument for relief. Instead they relied on constitutional protections on the sanctity of contracts to protect themselves against legislative action that threatened their property rights.
- Pigeon v. Buck, 237 U.S. 386 (1915).
- Fred T. Ley Co. v. United States, 273 U.S. 386 (1927).
- Adamos v. New York Life Insurance Company, 293 U.S. 386 (1935).
- Bowen v. Kizer, 485 U.S. 386 (1988).
- Chandler, Ralph C. The Constitutional Law Dictionary. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio, Inc., 1987.
- Cushman, Robert Fairchild with Susan P. Koniak. Leading Constitutional Decisions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1992.
- Menez, Joseph Francis. Summaries of Leading Cases of the Constitution. Savage, MD: Littlefield, Adams, 1990.
- Charles Lee Court-Martial: 1778 - Lee's Retreat At Monmouth, Lee Goads Washington, Lee's Trial
- Boston Massacre Trials: 1770 - Snowballs, Then Musket Balls Fly, The Redcoats Are Indicted, Captain Preston's Trial
- Calder v. Bull - The Facts Of The Case
- Calder v. Bull - High Court Rules
- Other Free Encyclopedias