Younger v. Harris
Significance, Further Readings
Evelle J. Younger
John Harris, Jr.
That the respondent's indictment for violation of California's criminal syndicalism law should stand, and that he should face trial for his offense.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Clifford K. Thompson, Jr.
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
A. L. Wirin
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black (writing for the Court), Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Warren E. Burger, John Marshall Harlan II, Thurgood Marshall, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
William O. Douglas
Date of Decision
23 February 1971
That the California criminal syndicalism statute could be enforced in good faith regardless of its constitutional validity, and that the respondent's indictment would stand.
- Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927).
- Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969).
- Zemel v. Rusk - Significance
- Wong Sun v. United States - Significance, Fruits Of The Poisonous Tree, Impact
- Younger v. Harris - Significance
- Younger v. Harris - Further Readings
- Other Free Encyclopedias