Penn Central Transportation Company v. City of New York - Significance
Penn Central Transportation Company
City of New York
That New York City had taken its private property in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments when designating the Grand Central Terminal as an historic landmark.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Daniel M. Gribbon
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Leonard J. Koerner
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr. (writing for the Court), Thurgood Marshall, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Warren E. Burger, William H. Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens
Date of Decision
26 June 1978
That the city of New York's designation of the Grand Central Terminal as a historic landmark, and the limitations on the use of the property inherent in that designation, did not constitute a taking of Penn Central's property.
- Barron v. Baltimore, 32 U.S. 243 (1833).
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926).
- United States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256 (1946).
- Berman v. Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954).
- Young v. American Mini Theaters, 427 U.S. 50 (1976).
- Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt, eds. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1996.
- Hall, Kermit L., ed. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
- Holmes, Barnham. The Fifth Amendment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Silver Burdett Press, 1991.
- People v. White - Significance, Double Execution, Unique Defense, The Blame Game
- Payton v. New York - Significance, Warrant Required For Entry Of A Home, A Common Law Rule, Impact, Further Readings
- Penn Central Transportation Company v. City of New York - Significance
- Other Free Encyclopedias