Train v. City of New York
Significance, Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari, The Environmental Protection Agency
Russell E. Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
City of New York
That the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) did not have to allot federal funds in their entirety to states according to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Robert H. Bork, U.S. Solicitor General
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
John R. Thompson
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Warren E. Burger, William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White (writing for the Court)
Date of Decision
18 February 1975
The EPA had to disburse funds in their entirety to states seeking financial assistance under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act; Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decision affirmed.
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroit, 362 U.S. 440 (1960).
- Philadelphia v. New Jersey, 430 U.S. 141 (1977).
- Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt, eds. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1996.
- Trimble v. Gordon - A Small But Contentious Estate, Discrimination Based On Legitimacy?, Impact, Heirs And Inheritance Laws
- Tony Boyle Trial: 1974 - Annette Gilly Confesses, Boyle Balks On Arraignment, Boyle's Secretary Spoils Defense
- Train v. City of New York - Significance
- Train v. City of New York - Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari
- Train v. City of New York - The Environmental Protection Agency
- Other Free Encyclopedias