1 minute read

Bush v. Vera

Significance, Three Districts Challenged, A Difficult Decision, Impact, Further Readings

Appellants

George W. Bush, Governor of Texas, et al.

Appellees

Al Vera, et al.

Appellants' Claim

The Texas state legislature created three new congressional districts with African American and Hispanic majorities to better reflect 1990 census demographics. Appellants claimed that these districts were narrowly tailored to satisfy the strict scrutiny requirement in the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Chief Lawyers for Appellants

Javier Aguilar (lawyer for state appellants), Paul Bender (lawyer for federal appellant), and Penda D. Hair (lawyer for private appellants)

Chief Lawyers for Appellees

Daniel E. Troy

Justices for the Court

Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor (writing for the Court), William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas

Justices Dissenting

Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David H. Souter, John Paul Stevens

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

13 June 1996

Decision

Although three congressional districts were not sufficiently tailored to protect minority rights, they were, nonetheless unconstitutionally created because racial factors predominated in their creation.

Related Cases

  • Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339 (1960).
  • Davis v. Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109 (1986).
  • Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993).
  • Miller v. Johnson, 515 U.S. 900 (1995).
  • Shaw v. Hunt, 517 U.S. 899 (1996).

Additional topics

Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1995 to Present