Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
Significance, Friends Of The Court, Dumping Roe, Roe Must Not Go, Both Sides Now
William L. Webster, Attorney General of Missouri, et al.
Reproductive Health Services, et al.
That the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit erred in overturning Missouri's laws restricting access to abortions.
Chief Lawyers for Appellants
William L. Webster, representing himself pro se (without counsel)
Chief Lawyer for Appellees
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Thurgood Marshall, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Antonin Scalia, John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White
Date of Decision
3 July 1989
Upheld Missouri's restrictions on access to abortion.
- Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
- Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 883 (1992).
- The West Memphis Three Trials: 1994 - The Confession Of Jessie Misskelley, The Trial Of Damien Echols And Jason Baldwin, Appeals Fail
- Waters v. Churchill - Significance, A Reasonable Belief, She Said She Said, Impact, Whistleblower Protection Act Of 1989
- Webster v. Reproductive Health Services - Significance
- Webster v. Reproductive Health Services - Further Readings
- Webster v. Reproductive Health Services - Friends Of The Court
- Webster v. Reproductive Health Services - Dumping Roe
- Webster v. Reproductive Health Services - Roe Must Not Go
- Webster v. Reproductive Health Services - Both Sides Now
- Other Free Encyclopedias