North Carolina v. T. D. R.
Significance, Teen Assault And Court Jurisdiction, When Juveniles Are Adults, Impact, Further Readings
State of North Carolina
T. D. R. (an unidentified juvenile)
That denial of a request for a two-week trial extension to gather new evidence did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Michael F. Easley
Chief Lawyer for Appelee
Kevin P. Bradley
Justice for the Court
Burley B. Mitchell, Jr. (writing for the court)
Durham, North Carolina
Date of Decision
6 February 1998
Upheld the state of North Carolina's claim by reversing two lower courts' decisions and returning the case to the lower courts for reinstatement of indictments against T. D. R.
- In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967).
- Breed v. Jones, 421 U.S. 519 (1975).
- In re Arthur, 231 S.E.2d 614 (1977).
- Schall v. Martin, 467 U.S. 253 (1984).
- Inc. v. City of Northlake O'Hare Truck Service - Significance, The Patronage System, Elrod, Branti, Rutan, The Case In The Lower Courts
- Norman-Bloodsaw v. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Significance, Medical Secrecy In California, A Right To Personal Privacy, Impact, Further Readings
- North Carolina v. T. D. R. - Further Readings
- North Carolina v. T. D. R. - Significance
- North Carolina v. T. D. R. - Teen Assault And Court Jurisdiction
- North Carolina v. T. D. R. - When Juveniles Are Adults
- North Carolina v. T. D. R. - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias