less than 1 minute read

Inc. v. Kay R.I.S.E. - Significance, The King And Queen Landfill Dilemma, Community Mobilization, Impact, Further Readings

Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994

Plaintiff

Residents Involved in Saving the Environment, Inc., and others

Defendant

King and Queen County Board of Supervisors consisting of five members: R. A. Kay, Jr., R. H. Bourne, J. R. Walton, R. F. Alsop, and W. L. Hickman

Plaintiff's Claim

That placing a landfill in a predominantly African American area results in a racially disproportionate impact and violates the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.

Chief Lawyer for Plaintiff

Sa'ad El-Amin

Chief Defense Lawyer

John Granville Douglass

Judge

Richard L. Williams (writing for the court)

Place

Richmond, Virginia

Date of Decision

21 June 1991

Decision

Ruled in favor of the Virginia county and allowed the project to proceed by finding that the racially disproportionate impact was not intentional.

Related Cases

  • Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926).
  • Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229 (1976).
  • Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Corp., 429 U.S. 252 (1977).

Additional topics