less than 1 minute read

Boynton v. Virginia

Significance, Court Splits, But For Boynton

Petitioner

Bruce Boynton

Respondent

Commonwealth of Virginia

Petitioner's Claim

That his arrest for refusing to leave a whites only section in a bus station restaurant violated the Interstate Commerce Act, and the Equal Protection, Due Process, and Commerce Clauses of the U.S. Constitution.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Thurgood Marshall

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Walter E. Rogers

Justices for the Court

Hugo Lafayette Black (writing for the Court), William J. Brennan, Jr., William O. Douglas, Felix Frankfurter, John Marshall Harlan II, Potter Stewart, Earl Warren

Justices Dissenting

Tom C. Clark, Charles Evans Whittaker

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

5 December 1960

Decision

Boynton's conviction was unconstitutional.

Related Cases

  • Curtis v. Roxxo & Mastracco, Inc., 413 F.Supp. 804 (1976).

Further Readings

  • The Negro History Bulletin. Vol. 26, no. 15, 1972.
  • Wasby, Stephen L., Anthony A. D'Amato, and Rosemary Metrailer. Desegregation from Brown to Alexander. Carbondale, IL.: South Illinois University Press, 1977.
  • Witt, Elder. Guide to the Supreme Court. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, 1990, p. 605.

Additional topics

Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1954 to 1962