United States v. Wong Kim Ark
The Locked Golden Gate, A Successful Writ, A Question Of Birthright, Further Readings
Wong Kim Ark
That the U.S. district court's affirmation of Wong's citizenship was in error.
Chief Lawyers for Appellant
Solicitor General Holmes Conrad, George D. Collins
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Thomas D. Riordan
Justices for the Court
David Josiah Brewer, Henry Billings Brown, Horace Gray (writing for the Court), Rufus Wheeler Peckham, George Shiras, Jr., Edward Douglass White
Melville Weston Fuller, John Marshall Harlan I (Joseph McKenna did not participate)
Date of Decision
28 March 1898
In favor of appellee Wong.
This was the first case in which the Court interpreted Section I of the Fourteenth Amendment, in which all persons born in the United States are defined as citizens.
- Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886).
- Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303 (1979).
- Vosburg v. Putney: 1890 - A Kick Rebounds, "a Peculiar Suit", Litigation Continues
- United States v. Winans - Significance, Court Sides With The Yakimas
- United States v. Wong Kim Ark - The Locked Golden Gate
- United States v. Wong Kim Ark - Further Readings
- United States v. Wong Kim Ark - A Successful Writ
- United States v. Wong Kim Ark - A Question Of Birthright
- Other Free Encyclopedias