Adamson v. California - Significance, Justice Black Argues For Total Incorporation, Due Process Of Law
The State of California
That the state prosecutor who drew the jury's attention to Adamson's refusal to testify at his own murder trial violated the Fifth Amendment's ban on self-incrimination.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Walter L. Bowers
Justices for the Court
Harold Burton, William O. Douglas, Felix Frankfurter, Robert H. Jackson, Stanley Forman Reed (writing for the Court), Wiley Blount Rutledge, Fred Moore Vinson
Hugo Lafayette Black, Frank Murphy
Date of Decision
23 June 1947
Finding that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment did not make all aspects of the Bill of Rights applicable at the state level, the Supreme Court declined to rule that the prosecutor had committed a crucial error and upheld Dewey's conviction.
- Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (1937).
- Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965).
West's Encyclopedia of American Law. Minneapolis, MN: West Publishing, 1998.
- Cortner, Richard C. The Supreme Court and the Second Bill of Rights. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1981.
- The Fourteenth Amendment and the Bill of Rights: The Incorporation Theory. New York: Da Capo Press, 1970.
- Nelson, William E. The Fourteenth Amendment: From Political Principle to Judicial Doctrine. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.
- Adler et al. v. Board of Education of the City of New York - Significance, The Feinberg Law
- Adamson v. California - Significance
- Adamson v. California - Justice Black Argues For Total Incorporation
- Adamson v. California - Due Process Of Law
- Other Free Encyclopedias