less than 1 minute read

Arizona v. Fulminante

Significance, Harmless Error And The Supreme Court, New Direction?, The Federal Bureau Of Investigation

Petitioner

State of Arizona

Respondent

Orestes C. Fulminante

Petitioner's Claim

That the Arizona Supreme Court had erred in awarding Fulminante a new trial for murder.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Barbara M. Jarrett

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Stephen R. Collins

Justices for the Court

Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter

Justices Dissenting

Harry A. Blackmun, Thurgood Marshall, John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

26 March 1991

Decision

Affirmed the lower court's decision to grant a new trial, on the basis that the state used an inadmissible, coerced confession to convict Fulminante.

Related Cases

  • Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967).

Sources

West's Encyclopedia of American Law. St. Paul, MN: West Group, 1998.

Sources

U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Capital Punishment 1996. Washington, DC: U.S. Government, 1997.

Additional topics

Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994