Miller v. California - Significance, The Miller Standard For Obscenity
State of California
That the state of California's definition of obscenity conflicted with that set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court, and that the Appellant's conviction in California State Court should be overturned.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Michael R. Capizzi
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger (writing for the Court), Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Byron R. White
William J. Brennan, Jr., William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall, Potter Stewart
Date of Decision
21 June 1973
The Supreme Court vacated and remanded the case, effectively affirming the lower courts' verdict.
- Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957).
- Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413 (1966).
Levy, Leonard W. . Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. New York: Macmillan, 1986.
- Bartlett, Jonathan, editor, The First Amendment in a Free Society. New York: H. W. Wilson, 1979.
- Jasper, Margaret C. The Law of Obscenity and Pornography. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1996.
- Johnson, John W., editor, Historic U.S. Court Cases, 1690-1990: An Encyclopedia. New York: Garland Publishing, 1992.
- Milliken v. Bradley - Significance, Busing: Was It Worth It?, Further Readings
- Miami Herald Publishing Company v. Tornillo - Significance, Appeal Goes To The U.s. Supreme Court, "free Press" Refers To Press Only
- Miller v. California - Significance
- Miller v. California - The Miller Standard For Obscenity
- Other Free Encyclopedias