Lovell v. City of Griffin - Significance, A Substantial Federal Question, Ordinance Is Unconstitutional Prior Restraint, `press' Includes Pamphlets
City of Griffin, Georgia
A city ordinance prohibiting distribution of any kind of literature within the city limits without permission of the city manager violates the First and Fourteenth. Amendments.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
O. R. Moyle
Chief Lawyers for Respondent
Hughes Spalding and Sumter M. Kelley
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black, Louis D. Brandeis, Pierce Butler, Charles Evans Hughes (writing for the Court), James Clark McReynolds, Stanley Forman Reed, Owen Josephus Roberts, Harlan Fiske Stone
None (Benjamin N. Cardozo did not participate)
Date of Decision
28 March 1938
The city ordinance was invalidated on its face under the First Amendment, and the defendant's conviction was reversed.
- Braden, Charles. These Also Believe. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1949.
- McCoy, Ralph E. Freedom of the Press, An Annotated Bibliography. Electronic Ed. CNI/AAUP Project, Library Affairs, SIUC. 10 January 1995. http://www.lib.siu.edu
- Owen, Ralph D., "Jehovah's Witnesses and Their Four Freedoms," University of Detroit Law Journal, March, 1951.
- Manton v. United States - Significance, "without Regard To The Merits", "conspiracy Constitutes The Offense"
- Liewellyn and Edith Banks Trial: 1933 - A Millionaire Before The Depression, Banks Supporters Bully County Officials, Banks Flees To Avoid Arrest
- Lovell v. City of Griffin - Significance
- Lovell v. City of Griffin - A Substantial Federal Question
- Lovell v. City of Griffin - Ordinance Is Unconstitutional Prior Restraint
- Lovell v. City of Griffin - `press' Includes Pamphlets
- Lovell v. City of Griffin - Impact
- Lovell v. City of Griffin - Related Cases
- Other Free Encyclopedias