Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District
Historical Background, The Facts Of The Case, The Lower Courts Rule, The Supreme Court Rules
Larry Zobrest, et al.
Catalina Foothills School District
The government can pay to provide a sign language interpreter for a deaf student attending a parochial school without violating the constitutional separation of church and state.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
William B. Ball
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
John C. Richardson
Justices for the Court
Anthony M. Kennedy, William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Byron R. White
Harry A. Blackmun, Sandra Day O'Connor, John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter
Date of Decision
18 June 1993
Reversed lower court rulings and held that the provision of a sign language interpreter in a parochial school did not violate First Amendment prohibitions against the establishment of a state religion.
This narrow 5-4 decision was one in a long line of cases in which the Supreme Court struggled to strike the proper balance between permissible and impermissible state aid to parochial schools. The closeness of the decision indicated that the issue would continue to be debated in the future.
Disposition of the Case
James Zobrest had already completed high school by the time the Supreme Court ruled in his favor. However, the Catalina Foothills School District agreed to reimburse his parents for the cost of hiring their own sign language interpreter.
Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District was a loss for those who favor a strict interpretation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Future decisions will reveal whether this case laid down a clear marker for states in determining what type of aid they can provide to religious schools.
- Helling v. McKinney, 509 U.S. 25 (1993).
- Reno v. Catholic School Services, Inc., 509 U.S. 43 (1993).
- Darby v. Cisneros, 509 U.S. 137 (1993).
- Shalala v. Schaeffer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).
"Parochial School Aid."The New Republic, 10 July 1971.
- Zion v. New York Hospital: 1994-95 - Formal Complaint Served, Conflicting Trial Testimony, Both Demerol And Doctors Blamed, Suggestions For Further Reading
- Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District - Historical Background
- Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District - Further Readings
- Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District - The Facts Of The Case
- Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District - The Lower Courts Rule
- Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District - The Supreme Court Rules
- Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District - Dissenting Opinions
- Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District - The Lemon Test
- Other Free Encyclopedias