Kent v. Dulles
Significance, Supreme Court Recognizes A New Fundamental Right: Foreign Travel, The Right To Travel
John Foster Dulles, U.S. Secretary of State
That the State Department's denial of a passport to an acknowledged communist violates the right to travel and the First Amendment right of free association.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Leonard B. Boudin
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
J. Lee Rankin, U.S. Solicitor General
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr., William O. Douglas (writing for the Court), Felix Frankfurter, Earl Warren
Harold Burton, Tom C. Clark, John Marshall Harlan II, Charles Evans Whittaker
Date of Decision
16 June 1958
The Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional for the State Department to withhold a passport based on the beliefs or associations of an applicant.
- Browder v. United States, 312 U.S. 335 (1941).
- Edwards v. California, 314 U.S. 160 (1941).
- Aptheker v. Secretary of State, 378 U.S. 500 (1964).
- Regan v. Wald, 468 U.S. 222 (1984).
Levy, Leonard W., ed. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. New York: Macmillan, 1986.
- Gillon, Steven M., and Diane B. Kunz. America During the Cold War. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1993.
- Houseman, Gerald L. The Right of Mobility. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1979.
- Hull, Elizabeth. Taking Liberties: National Barriers to the Free Flow of Ideas. New York, NY: Praeger, 1990.
- Mallory v. United States - Significance, Supreme Court Formulates Mcnabb-mallory Rule, Omnibus Crime Control And Safe Street Acts Of 1968
- Inc. John Henry Faulk v. Aware et al: 1962 - The Cold War Climate, Faulk Leads Fight Against Blacklisting, Trial Witnesses Hard To Find, Suggestions For Further Reading
- Kent v. Dulles - Significance
- Kent v. Dulles - Supreme Court Recognizes A New Fundamental Right: Foreign Travel
- Kent v. Dulles - The Right To Travel
- Other Free Encyclopedias