Slochower v. Board of Education of New York
Significance, Court Upholds Privilege Against Self-incrimination And Reinstates Professor, The Fifth Amendment
Board of Higher Education of the city of New York
That a provision of the city's charter prohibiting the use by employees of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination violated his due process rights.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Ephraim S. London
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Daniel T. Scannell
Justices for the Court
Tom C. Clark (writing for the Court), John Marshall Harlan II, Stanley Forman Reed, Sherman Minton, Earl Warren
Hugo Lafayette Black, Harold Burton, William O. Douglas, Felix Frankfurter
Date of Decision
9 April 1956
The Supreme Court found the provision unconstitutional.
- Adler v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 485 (1952).
- Ullmann v. United States, 350 U.S. 422 (1956).
Hurwitz, Howard L. An Encyclopedic Dictionary of American History. New York: Washington Square Press, 1974.
- Diamond, Sigmund. Compromised Campus: The Collaboration of Universities with the Intelligence Community, 1945-1955. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1992.
- Ladd, Everett Carll, and Seymour Martin Lipsett. The Divided Academy: Professors and Politics. NY: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
- Schrecker, Ellen. No Ivory Tower: McCarthyism and the Universities New York. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1986.
- Speiser v. Randall - Significance, Punishing Subversive Ideas, The Burden Of Proof, Justice Clark's Dissent, Impact
- Shelton v. Tucker - Significance, Three Teachers Refuse To Comply, Other Naacp Cases, Further Readings
- Slochower v. Board of Education of New York - Significance
- Slochower v. Board of Education of New York - Court Upholds Privilege Against Self-incrimination And Reinstates Professor
- Slochower v. Board of Education of New York - The Fifth Amendment
- Other Free Encyclopedias