Plain-Error Rule
trial entitled objection mistake
The principle that an appeals court can reverse a judgment and order a new trial because of a serious mistake in the proceedings, even though no objection was made at the time the mistake occurred.
The issuance of inconsistent instructions to a jury that would result in a miscarriage of justice, for example, can furnish the basis for a new trial, even though no timely and proper objection to the instructions was made. Although a person is entitled to a fair trial, he or she is not entitled to a flawless one; the individual does not have the right to a new trial merely because a HARMLESS ERROR has been committed.
User Comments
about 3 years ago
Sandiborowski
This version thoroughly explained the Plain Error Rule, and simplify it to the point that new law students can understand it and practising litigants can apply it.
almost 5 years ago
I was glad to find this definition the class book had it phrased in terminology that I did not understand. I now undertand and I thank you for having this site available to the public.