Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Free Legal Encyclopedia: Load Lines to Market value

Lobbying - Should Lobbyists Be Strictly Regulated?, Further Readings

act federal congress government

The process of influencing public and government policy at all levels: federal, state, and local.

Lobbying involves the advocacy of an interest that is affected, actually or potentially, by the decisions of government leaders. Individuals and interest groups alike can lobby governments, and governments can even lobby each other. The practice of lobbying is considered so essential to the proper functioning of the U.S. government that it is specifically protected by the FIRST AMENDMENT to the U.S. Constitution: "Congress shall make no law … abridging … the right of the people peaceably … to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The practice of lobbying provides a forum for the resolution of conflicts among often diverse and competing points of view; provides information, analysis, and opinion to legislators and government leaders to allow for informed and balanced decision making; and creates a system of checks and balances that allows for competition among interest groups, keeping any one group from attaining a permanent position of power. Lobbyists can help the legislative process work more effectively by providing lawmakers with reliable data and accurate assessments of a bill's effect.

The role lobbyists play in the legislative arena can be compared to that of lawyers in the judicial arena. Just as lawyers provide the trier of fact (judge or jury) with points of view on the legal issues pertaining to a case, so do lobbyists provide local, state, and federal policymakers with points of view on public policy issues.

Although lobbying as a whole serves as a checks-and-balances safeguard on the legislative process, individual lobbyists are not necessarily equal. Unlike voters, who each get one vote, lobbyists vary in their degree of influence. The level of influence a lobbyist has over the legislative process is often proportional to the resources—time and money—the lobbyist can spend to achieve its legislative goal. Some people think lobbyists in general have too much power. During his 1912 campaign for president, WOODROW WILSON remarked, "The government of the United States is a foster child of the special interests. It is not allowed to have a will of its own."

The term lobbyist has been traced to the mid-seventeenth century, when citizens would gather in a large lobby near the English House of Commons to express their views to members of Parliament. By the early nineteenth century, the term lobby-agent had come to the United States, where it was applied to citizens seeking legislative favors in the New York Capitol lobby, in Albany. By 1832 it had been shortened to lobbyist and was widely used at the U.S. Capitol.

In the early 2000s lobbyists practice their trade not only in the halls of the U.S. Capitol and the corridors of state legislatures, but also on playgrounds, in boardrooms, in manufacturing plants, at cocktail parties, and in retirement homes. Contemporary lobbying methods include POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEES, high-tech communication techniques, coalitions among groups and industries sharing the same political goals, and campaigns to mobilize constituents at the grassroots level. Lobbyists include schoolchildren who want to prevent their favorite neighborhood park from becoming a shopping mall, corporations who contribute to a particular legislator's campaign, lawyers who speak with legislators on behalf of their clients' business interests, cities who lobby the state legislature for changes in transportation laws, presidential aides who suggest new amendment language to congressional committee members, retired persons who want to save their government benefits, and many others. Each type of lobbyist attempts to win support for a particular point of view.

Samuel Ward, a well-respected lobbyist, was so successful at influencing legislators that in the mid-1800s Congress decided to investigate him. When questioned about the elegant dinners he orchestrated for politicians, the self-described King of the Lobby said, "At good dinners people do not talk shop, but they give people a right, perhaps, to ask a gentleman a civil question and get a civil answer."

Despite the noncorrupt success of lobbyists such as Ward, lobbyists during the mid-nineteenth century were often regarded as ethically questionable individuals. This reputation was enhanced whenever lobbyists abused their position with improper practices such as bribing members of Congress.

Although lobbying is specifically protected by the Constitution, numerous attempts have been made to regulate it—attempts that, not surprisingly, lobbyists have historically resisted. Congress began efforts to reform lobbying in 1907, when it banned campaign contributions from banks and corporations. In 1911 proposed restrictions on domestic lobbying were first considered, but these were not approved until 1946, when Congress passed the Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act (2 U.S.C.A. §§ 261, 261 note, 262–270 [1946]).

In 1954 lobbyists challenged the Regulation of Lobbying Act for being unconstitutionally vague and unclear. In United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612, 74 S. Ct. 808, 98 L. Ed. 989, the Supreme Court responded by upholding the act's constitutionality but also by narrowing the scope and application of the act. The Court ruled that the act applies only to paid lobbyists who directly communicate with members of Congress on pending or proposed federal legislation. This means that lobbyists who visit with congressional staff members rather than members of Congress themselves are not considered lobbyists. In addition, the act covers only attempts to influence the passage or defeat of legislation in Congress and excludes other congressional activities. Further, the act applies to and restricts only individuals who spend at least half of their time lobbying.

According to the 1946 act, lobbyists to whom the law applies are required to disclose their name and address; the names and addresses of clients for whom they work; how much they are paid and by whom; the names of all contributors to the lobbying effort and the amount of their contributions; accounts that tally all money received and expended, specifying to whom it was paid and for what purposes; the names of all publications in which the lobbyists have caused articles or editorials to be published; and the particular legislation they have been hired to support or oppose. In addition, the act requires lobbyists to file registration forms with the clerk of the House of Representatives and the secretary of the Senate prior to engaging in lobbying. These forms must be updated in the first ten days of each calendar quarter for as long as the lobbying activity continues. Violation of the act is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $5,000 or a jail sentence of up to 12 months, and a three-year prohibition on lobbying.

Although a number of lobbying statutes have been enacted that regulate special situations—such as lobbying by the agents of foreign governments, employees of holding companies, and firms affected by various federal shipping laws—the Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act remains the only comprehensive law governing the practice of lobbying.

Critics of the 1946 act suggest that its effectiveness is limited, since it does not apply to a large part of the population that actually lobbies the government. In fact, in 1991 the GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE found that nearly 10,000 of the 13,500 individuals and organizations listed in a popular lobbyist directory were not registered under the 1946 act.

In 1995 Congress passed a law designed to close loopholes in the 1946 law by increasing lobbyists' accountability: the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (Pub. L. No. 104-65, 109 Stat. 691). Under the new law, individuals who receive at least $5,000 in a six-month period from a single client are required to register with the clerk of the House and the secretary of the Senate, listing the congressional chambers and federal agencies they contacted, the issues they lobbied for, and how much money was spent on the effort. The reporting requirements also apply to organizations whose own employees lobby on their behalf and spend at least $20,000 in a six-month period on that effort.

Besides these federal regulations, states may separately enact their own regulations governing state lobbying. Most lobby restrictions involve reporting and registration provisions similar to those in place at the federal level.

CROSS-REFERENCES

Election Campaign Financing.

Local Action [next]

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

about 2 years ago

Thanks for your article, it can help me.
Really your post is really very good and I appreciate it.
It’s hard to sort the good from the bad sometimes,
You write very well which is amazing. I really impressed by your post.

Crystal X Mengatasi Keputihan
http://www.crystalxmengatasikeputihan.com
Keunggulan Produk Herbal Crystal X
http://www.crystalxmengatasikeputihan.com/2015/04/keunggulan-dari-crystal-x.html
Crystal X
http://distributor-resmi-nasa.blogspot.com/2013/05/manfaat-dan-bahaya-crystal-x.html
CRYSTAL X UNTUK PROGRAM HAMIL
http://www.crystalxmengatasikeputihan.com/2015/04/crystal-x-untuk-program-hamil-istri.html
Produk Terapi Untuk Suami Agar Istri Cepat Hamil
http://www.crystalxmengatasikeputihan.com/2015/04/produk-terapi-untuk-suami-agar-istri-cepat-hamil.html
Cara Pemesanan Produk Crytal X
http://www.crystalxmengatasikeputihan.com/p/blog-page.html
Cara Pemakaian Crystal X untuk Hasil Memuaskan
http://www.crystalxmengatasikeputihan.com/2015/04/cara-pemakaian-crystal-x-untuk-hasil.html
Crystal X Benar-Benar Aman
http://www.crystalxmengatasikeputihan.com/2015/04/apakah-crystal-x-benar-benar-aman_22.html
Khasiat Crystal X Merawat Organ Intim
http://www.crystalxmengatasikeputihan.com/2015/04/khasiat-crystal-x-merawat-organ-intim.html
Mengatasi Keputihan Dengan Crystal X
http://www.crystalxmengatasikeputihan.com/2015/04/mengatasi-keputihan-dengan-crystal-x.html
Peranan Crystal X Sebagai Pembunuh Bakteri Jahat
http://www.crystalxmengatasikeputihan.com/2015/04/peranan-crystal-x-sebagai-pembunuh.html
Fungsi Crystal X Untuk Memperlancar Menstruasi
http://www.crystalxmengatasikeputihan.com/2015/04/fungsi-crystal-x-untuk-memperlancar.html
Efek Samping Penggunaan Crystal X
http://www.crystalxmengatasikeputihan.com/2015/04/efek-samping-penggunaan-crystal-x.html
Mengatasi Keputihan Dengan Crystal X
http://www.crystalxmengatasikeputihan.com/2015/04/mengatasi-keputihan-dengan-crystal-x.html
Cara Mengatasi Keputihan Tanpa Efek Samping
http://www.crystalxmengatasikeputihan.com/2015/05/cara-mengatasi-keputihan-tanpa-efek.html

Vote down Vote up

over 5 years ago

I am sure the founding fathers did't mean for those petitions to include bribery with money and gifts when that rule was put into the Constitution.

Vote down Vote up

almost 6 years ago

Just read your definition of "lobbying". It is my understanding that it is not just average Americans asking for a redress of grievances but a bunch of monied people seeking ways to get the government to give them speicial deals so THEY can make more money off the backs of others who don't have the opportunity or money to 'redress' Congress.