To date, over 20 studies using these techniques have been published (see Raine, 1996). Taken together, these studies suggest that frontal and temporal dysfunction may be associated with violent behavior. The link between frontal dysfunction and impulsive, violent criminality is consistent with the notion that frontal lobe damage may be associated with a variety of correlates of violent behavior, including impulsivity, behavioral disinhibition, and poor concentration (Raine, 1993). It should be noted that these brain abnormalities may be caused by genetic, biological, or environmental agents. Criminals may be more likely to be involved in physical fights than noncriminals, and sustain head injuries as a result. Frontal lobe damage may also be attributed to birth or delivery complications, for example. Another concern relates to the issue of timing. Are structural and functional deficits present prior to the onset of criminal behavior, or are these changes in the brain triggered after the individual has begun their criminal career? To our knowledge, no study has been conducted examining pre-morbid measures of brain structure and function among criminals. Despite these issues, it is likely that our understanding of the biological and genetic underpinnings of criminal behavior will be greatly advanced through continued developments in brain imaging research.
User Comments Add a comment…
about 1 year ago
If we accept that an organism seeks a balance that supports existence and that what is defined as crimninal behavior is an effort to restore a balance and that all organisms are aware of this universal response in tmemselves and in other organisms then must acts of violence against the theory of survival be seen as expressions of warning that the system is failing at some point? As a potential correlation can it be seen that a creative artist's effort to arrive at "better" or find more effective adjustments of structural elements in an organization as a solution to a problem on the symbolic plane? And as an extension of that does the symmbolic solution equate to the practical?