Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Crime and Criminal Law » Capital Punishment: Legal Aspects - State Legislative Innovations, Early Constitutional Intervention, Constitutional Abolition In Furman V. Georgia, Post-furman Constitutional Regulation

Capital Punishment: Legal Aspects - Cases

georgia arizona louisiana oklahoma

Arave v. Creech, 507 U.S. 463 (1993).

Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977).

Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 (1982).

Eberheart v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 917 (1977).

Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).

Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).

Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262 (1976).

Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978).

Lowenfield v. Phelps, 484 U.S. 231 (1988).

McCleskey v. Kemp, 484 U.S. 279 (1987).

McGautha v. California, 402 U.S. 183 (1971).

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932).

Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242 (1976).

Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 325 (1976).

State of Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber, 330 U.S. 853 (1947).

Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988).

Tison v. Arizona, 481 U.S. 137 (1987).

Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 (1990).

Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968).

Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976).

[back] Capital Punishment: Legal Aspects - Bibliography

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or