Daniel James White Trial: 1979 - Unique Defense
schmidt reading verdicts gay
Schmidt capitalized on what had been a lackluster prosecution by turning the trial into an examination of White's mental state. Several psychiatrists testified that the defendant had not really meant to commit murder but had been driven to it by factors beyond his control. Much was made of White's prodigious intake of junkfood and candy—what came to be known as the "Twinkies Defense"—in which an abnormally high blood sugar count was blamed for the mayhem that he had wrought. It was a novel but effective defense.
But most effective of all were Schmidt's repeated portrayals of White as an upstanding young man, an ex-fireman and ex-police officer, someone who had been defeated by a corrupt system he was powerless to change. Schmidt cunningly marshaled public resentment against both politicians and homosexuals into one neat package. He found nothing unusual in the fact that White was carrying a gun on the fateful day (As an ex-cop, could anything have been more natural?), or that he had crawled in through a window at City Hall to, as one psychiatrist stated, avoid "embarrassing the officer at the metal detector." Dan White, Schmidt said, was acting under an "irresistible impulse to kill," and as such, under California law, was entitled to a verdict of manslaughter.
The jury agreed. On May 21, 1979, they returned two verdicts of voluntary manslaughter. Judge Walter Calcagno handed down the maximum sentence, seven years, and eight months imprisonment. With time off for good behavior, Dan White was looking at freedom in five years.
When news of the verdicts hit the streets, an already incendiary situation exploded. Five thousand gays marched on City Hall to protest, and a full-scale riot ensued. Inside the jail, the target of their rage, Dan White, lay on his cell cot, ears plugged against the bedlam.
Over concerted gay protests, White was paroled in 1984. But liberty proved even more onerous than incarceration. Plagued by demons that just wouldn't leave him alone, on October 21, 1985, Dan White wrote the final chapter in this tragedy by committing suicide.
The Dan White trial became a rallying call for homosexuals all across America. In their eyes, the jury had semi-officially sanctioned gay murder. Overlooked was the fact that George Moscone was a happily married family man. Somehow that got lost in the politics. Even so, it is difficult to dispute their firmly held belief that had White killed Moscone alone, he probably would still be behind bars.
—Colin Evans
Suggestions for Further Reading
Fitzgerald, Frances. "The Castro-II." New Yorker (July 28, 1986): 44-63.
Robinson, P. "Gays In The Streets." New Republic (June 9, 1979): 9-10.
Shilts, Randy. The Mayor of Castro Street. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1982.
Weiss, Mike. Double Play. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1984.
User Comments
almost 3 years ago
If Dan White had been convicted of either murder he wouldn't have been imprisioned, he would have been executed. Although California wasn't a death penalty state before 1979, it was after the passing of Proposition 7 the previous November, just a few weeks before the murders. In all the talk that year about the so-called Briggs bill, what was forgotton is that John Briggs actional had TWO ballot up to vote that year. While Prop 6 was defeated, Prop 7 passed; and prehaps due to death threats Briggs had recieved over his antigay rheteric he added a clause at the last minute to make it an automatical capital offanse to kill a public offical. Of coarse, neither John Briggs nor anyone else could have imagined the first person charged under this new provision would HIMSELF be a former public offical. Sense the defense made sure the jurors were all from Dan White's district, it seems fair to suppose they were less likely to find in favor of what would have been a death sentance.
about 3 years ago
I don't think he would have still be in prison if he had only killed Moscone. I think that you are overlooking what the times were like. It was a day when politicians were assassinated by loonies left and right. I think the jury was just so happy to find someone who was really not an evil loonie, someone they could show mercy to, that they were happy to do it. It was like a collective expiation of guilt, for not being able to stop Jonestown or seeing that White was in trouble. You had to do what you could.