Bercovici v. Chaplin: 1947
Plaintiff Claims Oral Agreement
On the witness stand, Bercovici said that he suggested a picture on dictators while visiting Chaplin's Pebble Beach, California home in 1938, and that Chaplin orally agreed to its production but subsequently rejected the idea. Nevertheless, he insisted, The Great Dictator, based on his script, appeared two years later.
In a courtroom filled to capacity, the final witness was Chaplin himself. The white-haired, 58-year-old comedian spoke rapidly and clearly to the jury of nine men and three women, gesturing frequently with his head and arms. When Bercovici suggested the idea, he said, he told the writer that he had been thinking it over himself for some time, and had outlined the story he had in mind not only to Bercovici but to Melvyn Douglas and others.
On direct examination, Chaplin identified his scrapbook for 1936. It contained several stories concerning the similarity of Hitler's mustache to the one Charlie wore on the screen. Chaplin's attorney, Louis Frohlich, asked, "Had the idea of impersonating Hitler come to you for the first time from Mr. Bercovici?"
"It had not," replied the witness.
Attorney Nizer introduced Bercovici's script as evidence. Chaplin said he had never seen it before. Nor did he make oral agreements, he said. His practice was to have all contracts in written form.
The next afternoon, May 1, Judge Burke called the attorneys for both sides to his office and asked them how much longer they expected the trial to last. Then he remarked, "I don't suppose you gentlemen ever thought of settling this, did you?"
The two sides, including Chaplin and Bercovici themselves, bargained from late afternoon until 10:00 P.M. The Bercovici side dropped first to $500,000, then to $350,000. Actively negotiating on his own behalf, Chaplin said he would not consider any settlement "in six figures." They finally agreed that Chaplin would pay Bercovici $95,000, including $5,000 for his legal expenses. Bercovici agreed to deliver to Chaplin a release covering any rights he had asserted in The Great Dictator. Chaplin also gained worldwide motion-picture rights to two Bercovici scenarios. Judge Burke dismissed the jury.
Five years later, Charlie Chaplin departed from the United States and settled in Switzerland with his young wife, the former Oona O'Neill, and their growing family. He died there in 1977 at the age of 88. It is not known whether he ever again saw his longtime friend Konrad Bercovici.
—Bernard Ryan, Jr.
Suggestions for Further Reading
Chaplin, Charles. My Autobiography. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1964.
Chaplin, Charles, Jr. My Father, Charlie Chaplin. New York: Random House, 1960.
Epstein, Jerry. Remembering Charlie. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Co., 1989.
Gifford, Denis. Chaplin. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Co., 1960.
Haining, Peter. The Legend of Charlie Chaplin. Secaucus, N.J.: Castle, 1982.
MlcCabe, John. Charlie Chaplin. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Co., 1978.
McCaffrev, Donald W., ed. Focus on Chaplin. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1971.
Manvell, Roger. Chaplin. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1974.
Robinson, David. Chaplin, His Life and Art. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1985.
. Chaplin, the Mirror of Opinion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1983.
Additional topics
- Bercovici v. Chaplin: 1947 - Suggestions For Further Reading
- Bercovici v. Chaplin: 1947 - "the Little Tramp" Plays To A Full House
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1941 to 1953Bercovici v. Chaplin: 1947 - "the Little Tramp" Plays To A Full House, Plaintiff Claims Oral Agreement, Suggestions For Further Reading