Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1883 to 1917 » Triangle Shirtwaist Fire Trial: 1911 - 146 Triangle Employees Die, Blanck And Harris Go Free

Triangle Shirtwaist Fire Trial: 1911 - Blanck And Harris Go Free

safety judge seabury guilty

On December 27, 1911, the jury announced its verdict. It pronounced Blanck and Harris not guilty. Although the prosecution's evidence was compelling,, it was not enough to overcome the judge's instructions. As one juror stated:

I believed that the door was locked at the time of the fire. But we couldn't find them guilty unless we believed they knew the door was locked.

With the support of District Attorney Charles S. Whitman, the prosecutors moved for another trial. Judge Samuel Seabury presided over the retrial. Despite public outrage against the first trial's acquittal, on March 12, 1912, Judge Seabury ordered the retrial dismissed on the grounds that the defendants were being tried for the same offense. Based upon the principle of double jeopardy, Judge Seabury proclaimed:

A union march in memory of the victims of the Triangle Shirtwaist fire. (Courtesy, Library of Congress) A union march in memory of the victims of the Triangle Shirtwaist fire. (Courtesy, Library of Congress)

The court has neither the right nor the power to proceed with the present trial. These men are to be tried for the same offense again and under our constitution and laws, this cannot be done. I charge you, gentlemen of the jury, to find a verdict for the defendants.

Blanck and Harris left the courtroom free men. The impact of the Triangle fire, however, was not lost. New York City soon had a Bureau of Fire Prevention, which implemented stricter safety regulations and saw to their enforcement. Other cities and states followed suit in the years and decades to come. The federal government finally acted to ensure workplace safety during the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt, and FDR's measures were the predecessor to such protective agencies as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Today, there are extensive federal and state safety regulations to protect workers from the sort of dangers that resulted in the Triangle fire.

Stephen G. Christianson

Suggestions for Further Reading

Crute, Sheree. "The Insurance Scandal Behind the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire." MS. (April 1983): 81-82.

Stein, Leon. The Triangle Fire. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1962.

"A Sweatshop Worker Remembers." MS (April 1983): 83.

[back] Triangle Shirtwaist Fire Trial: 1911 - 146 Triangle Employees Die

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

over 3 years ago

I have been studying the fire i think they are guilty

Vote down Vote up

over 4 years ago

I would have to say that the verdict on this particular case was a poor one. Because the managers/ owners were careless, our country lost 146 lives. Because the managers/owners were lazy, a factory was burned down. And because the owners were only concerned about their well-being, our country suffered one of the WORST factory fires of all time. Acutally, it was THE worst. In my opinion, the owners were GUILTY AS CHARGED, and should have been sentenced toa very long jail time period, and/or death sentence. Thank You



email me at: woahbabyplease@yahoo.com



--stephanie manweiner--

Vote down Vote up

over 2 years ago

I think that the aquital of theese men was fair and just. Wethere or not we personaly think them guilty It could not be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that theese men KNEW that the door on the 9th floor was locked. TO have found them guilty would be against the very Ideals of this country. However the ruleing in the civil cases in my opinion was fair.

Vote down Vote up

7 months ago

I can't help but wonder if there were anyone on the jury who were paid to let these greedy moneygrubbers free. A life is a life whether it be male or female.