Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1941 to 1953 » McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education - Significance, Separate But Equal, Abandonment Of The "separate But Equal" Doctrine, Not Separate But Still Unequal

McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education - Impact

court separate american law

McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education represents a watershed for the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. In conjunction with Sweatt v. Painter (1950), in which, on the same day that it announced its ruling in McLaurin , the Court ruled that the University of Texas Law School had to admit African American students despite the existence of traditionally black law schools within the state, the case marked the beginning of the end of the legal doctrine of separate but equal within higher education in the United States. Despite Chief Justice Vinson's death in 1953, the Court continued its advocacy of racial integration under his successor, Earl Warren. Under Warren, the Court completely disposed of the doctrine of separate but equal and delivered what may be its most famous and influential decision: that states could not bar children of African American descent from attending public primary and secondary schools in Brown v. Board of Education (1954).

[back] McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education - Equal Protection Or Equal Treatment?

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or