Dothard v. Rawlinson
The District Court Rules
The district court ruled in Rawlinson's favor on both counts. It relied on national statistics that outlined the comparative heights and weights of men and women to show that the Alabama prison guard requirements would exclude more than 40 percent of the female population but less than one percent of the male population. The court held that this, on its face, was evidence of sex discrimination against women. On the issue of the "close contact" prohibition, the district court rejected the state of Alabama's contention that being male was a necessary qualification for serving as a guard in a male penitentiary. It decreed that this regulation was impermissible under Title VII as well. E. C. Dothard, the director of Alabama's Department of Public Safety, then appealed the case to the U.S. Supreme Court on the state's behalf.
Additional topics
- Dothard v. Rawlinson - A Split Decision
- Dothard v. Rawlinson - Further Readings
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980Dothard v. Rawlinson - Case Background, The District Court Rules, A Split Decision, Dissenting Opinions, Further Readings