He found no support in Washington in his efforts to regain active duty assignment. Instead, he began to hear that Stephen Decatur, his former protege and a leader in the move to court-martial him, was making what he considered libelous and derogatory remarks. In 1820, Barron challenged him to a duel, and although both wounded each other, Barron survived and Decatur died. Barron did in fact regain an active duty assignment with the navy in 1824, but it was his fate to go down in American history as "the man who killed Decatur."
—John S. Bowman
Suggestions for Further Reading
Proceedings of the General Court Martial Convened for the Trial of Commodore James Barron … January 1808. Washington, D.C.: James Gideon, Jr., 1808.
Stevens, William Oliver. An Affair of Honor: The Biography of Commodore James Barron, U.S.N. Chesapeake, Va.: Norfolk Historical Society, 1969.
Watson, Paul Barron. The Tragic Career of Commodore James Barron, U.S. Navy. New York: Coward-McCann, 1942.
User Comments Add a comment…
11 months ago
I am a retired naval officer, a Naval Academy graduate and an amateur naval historian. It is of no small significance that Mid'n Decatur sailed under the command of Captain Barron at the outset of his career. On warships of 19th century, it was impossible for a midshipman to escape the scrutiny of the commanding officer. The nature of that early relationship had to form Decatur's opinion of Barron, and from my personal experience, opinions formed within the confines of a warship during extended periods at sea are deep and immutable. If Captain Barron had taken Mid'n Decatur under his wing, there is little Decatur would not have done to support Barron. The converse is even more true. I have seen it firsthand on countless occasions. Aloof and abusive captains (e.g. VADM William Bligh, RN) never live down their reputations.