Butz v. Economou
The Lower Court Rulings
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York was the first to rule. It dismissed Economou's complaint against the individual defendants. The court held that federal officials were entitled to absolute immunity for all discretionary acts within the scope of their authority. Economou then appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals, which reversed the lower court's ruling. The court of appeals held that federal officials were entitled only to the qualified immunity granted to state government officials. Earl Butz, the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, appealed this ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Additional topics
- Butz v. Economou - Officials Entitled To Qualified Immunity
- Butz v. Economou - Significance
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980Butz v. Economou - Significance, The Lower Court Rulings, Officials Entitled To Qualified Immunity, Officials Not Liable For Mistakes In Judgment