Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1941 to 1953 » Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber - Petitioner's Claim, Decision, Significance, A Cruel And Unusual Punishment?, What Is The State's Responsibility?

Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber - Petitioner's Claim

amendment attempt electrocution

The petitioner, who had been sentenced to die by electrocution, had survived the state's first electrocution attempt; he contended that for the state to try to electrocute him again would be "cruel and unusual punishment" under the Eighth Amendment, double jeopardy (being tried twice for the same crime) under the Fifth Amendment, and a violation of his right to due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment (since other prisoners only had to undergo one execution attempt).

Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber - Decision [next]

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or