less than 1 minute read

Salem Witchcraft Trials: 1692

Evidence Questioned



An independent opinion from New York clergy criticized almost every type of evidence accepted by the Massachusetts court. When the next court convened, spectral evidence was eliminated as a basis for conviction. Only three were convicted. Eventually Phips reprieved all the condemned.



But the reprieved still had legal and financial problems caused by the trials. The simplest was that jail residents had to pay their prison (lodging) fees before they were released.

As the emotional temper of the colony quieted, qualms about the witch trials grew. In January 1697, the General Court ordered a day of prayer and fasting. In 1703 and 1710, in response to petitions, the legislature reversed most of the convictions and voted compensation to the convicted or their families. Even Ann Putnam eventually repented in church. The convictions of seven, for whom no one submitted petitions, remain on record.

Teddi DiCanio

Suggestions for Further Reading

Gragg, Larry. "Under an Evil Hand." American Histoy Illustrated (March-April 1992): 54-59.

Starkey, Marion 1. The Devil in Massachusetts, A Modern Enquiry into the Salem Witch Trials. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Co. 1949.

Upham, Charles W. Salem Witchcraft. Williamstown, Mass.: Corner House Publishers, 1971.

Additional topics

Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1637 to 1832Salem Witchcraft Trials: 1692 - Magistrates Hold A Hearing, Jails Fill With Accused, Evidence Questioned