Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Crime and Criminal Law » Rape: Legal Aspects - Forcible Rape: Purpose Of The Law, Forcible Rape: Punishment, Forcible Rape: Elements Of The Offense

Rape: Legal Aspects - Forcible Rape: Purpose Of The Law

women sexual protection traditionally

Modern rape laws are conceived primarily as a means to protect women and men against physical harm, emotional injury, and interference with sexual autonomy (the right to choose the circumstances of sexual intimacy). Historically, the purposes of rape law were more limited, and the law's coverage was narrow. Rape law was long concerned, for example, with protecting the chastity of women. In practice, sexually experienced victims received far less protection, and the law often endorsed that perspective, for example, in its preoccupation at trial with evidence of a woman's prior sexual history.

In addition, rape law traditionally focused on protecting property-like interests of men—the interest of a father in the virginity (and thus the marriagability) of his daughter and the interest of a husband in exclusive sexual access to his wife. Thus, rape law did not apply when a woman was forced to have sex with her husband. Vestiges of these narrow conceptions of the law's purpose may survive today and may partially explain resistance to shedding traditional limits on the coverage of the offense.

The common complaint that rape law was (and perhaps still is) unfair to women is, at first glance, somewhat surprising because rape law traditionally protected only women; it afforded no protection at all to male victims of sexual assault. In what sense, then, is it plausible to think of rape law as discriminating against women?

Several points must be noted. First, the protection afforded to women was traditionally hedged with evidentiary restrictions unknown in other offenses. Second, rape law as traditionally administered provided fully effective protection only to certain women—those who dressed modestly, behaved properly, and did nothing to invite a sexual advance. By offering its primary protection only to such women, the law in effect favored (and perhaps still favors) some women over others.

This last feature of the law, moreover, arguably discriminates against all women, in that it may channel women into certain patterns of behavior and thus deny all women the freedom to choose a fully independent life. A nondiscriminatory law of rape arguably should protect the right of all persons, women and men, to freely choose the circumstances of sexual intimacy, without withholding protection from those who drink, walk alone at night, talk to strangers, or lead unconventional lives.

Rape: Legal Aspects - Forcible Rape: Punishment [next]

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

over 6 years ago

Dear Sirs,

I'm trying to find out how a court will approach a "my word against your word" case, if there are no hard evidence like documents, pictures, videos, or on the scene witnesses. For example in a rape case where the plaintiff alleges that she was raped 10 years ago, and decided to come forward now. Since the rape allegedly happened many years ago, she cannot produce any objective evidence in court, like rape marks on her body, DNA, and she never told anyone about it, until now. I'm not giving details about the defendant because the above case is merely an example and details are not important.
I suppose the court will try to decide on her credibility, based on inconsistencies in her story, or try to establish a motive that will justify a false accusation.
But what if there are no apparent inconsistencies or motives?
My concern is how a vague philosophical issue like "my word against your word" is incorporated into law in such a discrete way, required in order for a court to pronounce long term sentences.
I'd appreciate if you would kindly point me to relevant resources on internet.

Thank you very much for your time.

Vote down Vote up

over 9 years ago

The comment is really Blackstones, yet you do not mention it when attempting to explain the 'female discrimination'aspects of rape law. He said, "Rape is a charge that is easy to make, difficult to prove and almost impossible to defend". The burning question is do we err on the side of the impossiblity of defence to the detriment of complainants?