Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1833 to 1882

Ex parte Milligan - Significance, Further Readings

petitioner military court commission

Petitioner

Lambdin P. Milligan

Respondent

United States

Petitioner's Claim

A military commission was not a competent tribunal for the trial of the petitioner, a military commission may not try nor convict him, and the petitioner should be released.

Chief Lawyers for Petitioner

J. S. Black, J. E. McDonald, J. A. Garfield, David Dudley Field, A. L. Roache, John R. Coffuth

Chief Lawyers for Respondent

James Speed; Henry Stanbery, U.S. Attorney General; Benjamin F. Butler

Justices for the Court

Salmon Portland Chase, Nathan Clifford, David Davis (writing for the Court), Stephen Johnson Field, Robert Cooper Grier, Samuel Freeman Miller, Samuel Nelson, Noah Haynes Swayne, James Moore Wayne

Justices Dissenting

None

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

3 April 1866

Decision

The trial of Milligan on charges of treason and conspiracy, was found to be illegal because it was conducted by a military court.

Related Cases

  • Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).
  • Ex parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942).
Ex Parte Siebold - Significance, Stuffing The Ballot Box, Who Is In Charge?, The Court Fights Back [next] [back] Ex Parte McCardle: 1868 - Congress Denies Mccardle Access To Supreme Court, Congress Could Not Be Denied

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or