Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1833 to 1882

Luther v. Borden - Significance, Insurrection In Providence, Which Was The Rightful Government?, Political Vs. Natural Rights

court john martin appellant

Appellant

Martin Luther

Appellee

Luther M. Borden

Appellant's Claim

Luther M. Borden, acting under the martial law that had been declared by the state of Rhode Island, had invaded and searched Martin Luther's home. Martin Luther claimed that the government, under which Borden had acted, was not the legitimate government of Rhode Island. Therefore, Borden was guilty of trespass.

Chief Lawyers for Appellant

Benjamin F. Hallett; Nathan Clifford, U.S. Attorney General

Chief Lawyers for Appellee

John Whipple, Daniel Webster

Justices for the Court

Robert Cooper Grier, John McLean, Samuel Nelson, Roger Brooke Taney (writing for the Court), James Moore Wayne

Justices Dissenting

Levi Woodbury (John Catron, Peter Vivian Daniel, and John McKinley did not participate)

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

3 January 1849

Decision

That the Court did not have the power to decide that a state government was not legitimate.

Related Cases

  • Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).
  • Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 1 Wheat. 316 (1819).
  • Cohens v. Virginia, 6 Wheat. 264 (1821).
  • Foster v. Neilson, 2 Pet. 253 (1829).
  • United States v. Texas, 143 U.S. 621 (1892).

Sources

Bradley, David and Shelley Fisher Fishkin, eds. The Encyclopedia of Civil Rights in America Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 1998.

Sources

Knappman, Edward W., ed. Great American Trials. Detroit, MI: Visible Ink Press, 1994.

Further Readings

  • Johnson, John W., ed. Historic U.S. Court Cases, 1690-1990: An Encyclopedia. New York: Garland Publishing, 1992.
  • Rosenblum, Victor G., and A. Didrick Castberg. Cases in Constitutional Law, Political Roles of the Supreme Court. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press, 1973.
  • Swisher, Carl B. The History of the Supreme Court of the United States: The Taney Period, 1836-64, Vol. 5. New York: Macmillan, 1974.
Mackenzie Court-Martial: 1843 [next] [back] Kilbourn v. Thompson - Significance, An Uncooperative Witness, Preserving The Separation Of Powers, Congressional Immunity, Samuel R. Lowery, African American Lawyer

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

over 5 years ago

This is great info. I am looking up the case for a school project, I found this useful to help.