Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1833 to 1882

Scott v. Sandford - Significance, Scott Sues For Freedom, Scott Tries Federal Courts, Victory For Slavery, Defeat For Scott

john washington plaintiff sources

Plaintiff

Dred Scott

Defendant

John F. A. Sanford

Plaintiff's Claim

That Scott, who was a slave, had become a free man when his owner had taken him to a state designated as "free" under the 1820 Missouri Compromise.

Chief Lawyers for Plaintiff

Samuel M. Bay, Montgomery Blair, George Ticknor Curtis, Alexander P. Field, Roswell M. Field, David N. Hall

Chief Defense Lawyers

Hugh A. Garland, H. S. Geyer, George W. Goode, Reverdy Johnson, Lyman D. Norris

Justices for the Court

John Archibald Campbell, John Catron, Peter Vivian Daniel, Robert Cooper Grier, Samuel Nelson, Roger Brooke Taney (writing for the Court), James Moore Wayne

Justices Dissenting

Benjamin Curtis, John McLean

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

6 March 1857

Decision

That Dred Scott was still a slave, regardless of where his owner took him.

Related Cases

  • Stader v. Graham, 10 How. 82 (1851).
  • Ableman v. Booth, 21 How. 506 (1859).
  • Commonwealth v. Aves, 18 Pickering 193 (1936).

Sources

Biskupic, Joan and Witt, Elder. Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, third edition Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, 1997.

Sources

Hurwitz, Howard L. An Encyclopedic Dictionary of American History New York: Washington Square Press, 1974.

Shaw v. Shaw - Significance, Sticks And Stones, Patriarchal Power, Spousal Abuse, Further Readings [next] [back] Roberts v. City of Boston: 1848-49 - Suit Challenges Segregated Schools, Court Backs Segregation, Suggestions For Further Reading

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or