National League of Cities v. Usery
Significance, A Violation Of The Tenth Amendment, The Court Affirms, Dissent: The Tenth As A "truism"
Appellant
National League of Cities, et al.
Appellee
W. J. Usery Jr., U.S. Secretary of Labor
Appellant's Claim
That 1974 congressional amendments to the Fair Labor Standards Act, placing state governments under the authority of minimum wage and maximum hour provisions in the act, constituted a violation of the Tenth Amendment.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Charles S. Rhyne
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Robert Bork, U.S. Solicitor General
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Potter Stewart
Justices Dissenting
William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
24 June 1976
Decision
That congressional use of the Fair Labor Standards Act to regulate the states' employment policy was unconstitutional because it violated the Tenth Amendment, which reserves for the states all power not delegated to the federal government.
Additional topics
- Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart - Significance, Related Cases, The "little Lindbergh Law"
- Murray R. Gold Trials: 1976-92 - A Former Son-in-law, A Dead Culprit?, Second Trial, … Waving In The Wind"
- National League of Cities v. Usery - Further Readings
- National League of Cities v. Usery - Significance
- National League of Cities v. Usery - A Violation Of The Tenth Amendment
- National League of Cities v. Usery - The Court Affirms
- National League of Cities v. Usery - Dissent: The Tenth As A "truism"
- National League of Cities v. Usery - Impact
- National League of Cities v. Usery - Related Cases
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980