Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1883 to 1917

Coppage v. Kansas - Significance, Employers' Rights Upheld, Dissent Over "freedom Of Contract", Impact, Yellow-dog Contracts

appellant amendment appellee decision


T. B. Coppage


State of Kansas

Appellant's Claim

Kansas statute prohibiting "yellow dog contracts" did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Chief Lawyers for Appellant

R. R. Vermilon, W. F. Evans

Chief Lawyers for Appellee

John S. Dawson, Attorney General of Kansas; J. I. Sheppard

Justices for the Court

Joseph Rucker Lamar, Joseph McKenna, James Clark McReynolds, Mahlon Pitney (writing for the Court), Willis Van Devanter, Edward Douglass White

Justices Dissenting

William Rufus Day, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Charles Evans Hughes


Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

25 January 1915


The Kansas statute, which outlawed yellow dog contracts, was an invalid and repressive infringement of an employer's right to engage in "freedom of contract" under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Related Cases

  • Frisbie v. United States, 157 U.S. 160 (1895).
  • Holden v. Hardy, 169 U.S. 366 (1898).
  • Adair v. United States, 208 U.S. 161 (1908).
  • Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. McGuire, 219 U.S. 549 (1911).


West's Encyclopedia of American Law. Minneapolis, Minnesota: West Publishing, 1998.

Coyle v. Smith - Significance, Further Readings [next] [back] Civil Rights Cases

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or