Coppage v. Kansas
Significance, Employers' Rights Upheld, Dissent Over "freedom Of Contract", Impact, Yellow-dog Contracts
Appellant
T. B. Coppage
Appellee
State of Kansas
Appellant's Claim
Kansas statute prohibiting "yellow dog contracts" did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Chief Lawyers for Appellant
R. R. Vermilon, W. F. Evans
Chief Lawyers for Appellee
John S. Dawson, Attorney General of Kansas; J. I. Sheppard
Justices for the Court
Joseph Rucker Lamar, Joseph McKenna, James Clark McReynolds, Mahlon Pitney (writing for the Court), Willis Van Devanter, Edward Douglass White
Justices Dissenting
William Rufus Day, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Charles Evans Hughes
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
25 January 1915
Decision
The Kansas statute, which outlawed yellow dog contracts, was an invalid and repressive infringement of an employer's right to engage in "freedom of contract" under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Related Cases
- Frisbie v. United States, 157 U.S. 160 (1895).
- Holden v. Hardy, 169 U.S. 366 (1898).
- Adair v. United States, 208 U.S. 161 (1908).
- Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. McGuire, 219 U.S. 549 (1911).
Sources
West's Encyclopedia of American Law. Minneapolis, Minnesota: West Publishing, 1998.
Additional topics
- Coyle v. Smith - Significance, Further Readings
- Civil Rights Cases
- Coppage v. Kansas - Further Readings
- Coppage v. Kansas - Significance
- Coppage v. Kansas - Employers' Rights Upheld
- Coppage v. Kansas - Dissent Over "freedom Of Contract"
- Coppage v. Kansas - Impact
- Coppage v. Kansas - Yellow-dog Contracts
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1883 to 1917