Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1883 to 1917

Lochner v. New York - Significance, A Baker's Lawyer, Due Process And Daniel Webster, A Surprise Verdict

court appellant decision act


Joseph Lochner


People of the State of New York

Appellant's Claim

That Lochner had not violated the New York Bakeshop Act because the law was an unreasonable exercise of police power.

Chief Lawyers for Appellant

Frank Harvey Field, Henry Weismann

Chief Lawyer for Appellee

Julius M. Mayer, attorney general of New York

Justices for the Court

David Josiah Brewer, Henry Billings Brown, Melville Weston Fuller, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Joseph McKenna, Rufus Wheeler Peckham (writing for the Court)

Justices Dissenting

William Rufus Day, John Marshall Harlan I, Edward Douglass White


Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

17 April 1905


In protecting the right to contract for labor, the Court overruled New York's Bakeshop Act, which regulated sanitary conditions and the number of hours that employees could work.

Related Cases

  • Allgeyer v. Louisiana, 165 U.S. 578 (1897).
  • Wilson v. New, 243 U.S. 332 (1917).
  • Adkins v. Children's Hospital, 261 U.S. 525 (1923).
  • West Coast Hotel v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937).
Lochner v. New York - Further Readings [next] [back] Lizzie Borden Trial: 1893 - Lizzie Charged With Murder, Attorneys Wrap Up, Judges' Instructions Favor Lizzie, Suggestions For Further Reading

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

about 10 years ago

"This web site has really helped me do my work in school. Thank you so much!