Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1995 to Present

Amchem Products v. Windsor - Significance, The Proper Question Of Class Certification, Breyer Urges Action, Further Readings

respondents petitioners settlement individuals

Petitioners

Amchem Products and 19 other companies

Respondents

George Windsor and other individuals

Petitioners' Claim

Appellants desired to settle a large class-action suit with a number of individuals and families; respondents in this case were a group of persons involved in the suit who objected to the settlement under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Justices for the Court

Ruth Bader Ginsburg (writing for the Court), Anthony M. Kennedy, William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter, Clarence Thomas

Justices Dissenting

Stephen Breyer, John Paul Stevens, (Sandra Day O'Connor did not participate)

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

25 June 1997

Decision

That the "sprawling class" represented in the large class-action settlement did not constitute a class at all under Rule 23.

Related Cases

  • Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroit, 362 U.S. 440 (1960).
  • Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. 83 F. 34d 610 (1996).
  • Walker v. Liggett Group, Inc. 175 F.R.D. 226 (1997).
  • In re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices Litigation, 148 F.3d 283 (1998).
American Civil Liberties Union v. Miller - Significance, Legal Action Created Politically Diverse Group Of Plaintiffs, Jurisdiction A Question Of Precedent, A Question Of First Amendment Rights [next] [back] Amadou Diallo/NYPD Trial: 2000 - Unarmed And Law Abiding, "every Police Officer's Nightmare", "gun! He's Got A Gun!"

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or