Schlesinger v. Holtzman
Significance, A Unique Series Of Events, The Court Defers Action Again, Impact
Petitioner
James Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense
Respondent
Rep. Elizabeth Holtzman (D-NY) and several Air Force officers
Petitioner's Claim
That without decisive opposition by Congress the president has constitutional authority to conduct air combat over Cambodia.
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Warren E. Burger (writing for the Court), Thurgood Marshall, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
William O. Douglas
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
4 August 1973
Decision
Upheld the U.S. claim and affirmed a court of appeals decision by reversing Justice Douglas's decision to temporarily halt U.S. bombing in Cambodia.
Related Cases
- United States v. Curtiss-Wright Corp., 299 U.S. 304 (1936).
- Rosenburg v. United States, 346 U.S. 273 (1953).
- Holtzman v. Schlesinger, 414 U.S. 1304 (1973).
- Goldwater v. Carter, 444 U.S. 996 (1979).
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983).
Further Readings
- Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt. Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, 1997.
- Lindsay, James M. Congress and the Politics of U.S. Foreign Policy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.
- Peterson, Paul E., ed. The President, The Congress, and the Making of Foreign Policy. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1994.
Additional topics
- Schneckloth v. Bustamonte - Significance, Impact
- Schlesinger v. Ballard - Significance, Lieutenant Ballard Receives A Mandatory Discharge, Frontiero And Reed Offer A Guide--and A Contrast
- Schlesinger v. Holtzman - Significance
- Schlesinger v. Holtzman - A Unique Series Of Events
- Schlesinger v. Holtzman - The Court Defers Action Again
- Schlesinger v. Holtzman - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980