Younger v. Harris
Significance, Further Readings
Appellant
Evelle J. Younger
Appellee
John Harris, Jr.
Appellant's Claim
That the respondent's indictment for violation of California's criminal syndicalism law should stand, and that he should face trial for his offense.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Clifford K. Thompson, Jr.
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
A. L. Wirin
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black (writing for the Court), Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Warren E. Burger, John Marshall Harlan II, Thurgood Marshall, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
William O. Douglas
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
23 February 1971
Decision
That the California criminal syndicalism statute could be enforced in good faith regardless of its constitutional validity, and that the respondent's indictment would stand.
Related Cases
- Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927).
- Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969).
Additional topics
- Zemel v. Rusk - Significance
- Wong Sun v. United States - Significance, Fruits Of The Poisonous Tree, Impact
- Younger v. Harris - Significance
- Younger v. Harris - Further Readings
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972