Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1918 to 1940

State of Missouri v. Holland - Bird Protection And Treaty-making, The Ownership Of Nature, The Migratory Bird Treaty, Further Readings

court laws appellant william

Appellant

Frank W. McAllister, Attorney General of Missouri

Appellee

Ray P. Holland

Appellant's Claim

That federal laws pursuant to the Migratory Bird Act and enforcement thereof were an invasion of sovereign states rights as set forth in the Tenth Amendment.

Chief Lawyers for Appellant

Alexander C. King, Solicitor General; William L. Frierson, Assistant Attorney General

Chief Lawyers for Appellee

John T. Gose, J. Harvey

Justices for the Court

Louis D. Brandeis, John Hessin Clarke, William Rufus Day, Oliver Wendell Holmes (writing for the Court), Joseph McKenna, James Clark McReynolds, Edward Douglass White

Justices Dissenting

Mahlon Pitney, Willis Van Devanter

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

19 April 1920

Decision

The Court ruled in favor of Holland, upholding the U.S. government's treaty and its relevant statutes.

Significance

By affirming Congress' right to make treaties whose terms might supercede state laws, the Court established one of the first wildlife protection laws.

Related Cases

  • Baldwin v. Franks, 120 U.S. 678 (1887).
  • Baldwin v. Montana Fish and Game Commission, 430 U.S. 371 (1978).

Sources

Eblen, Ruth A. and William R. Eblen, eds. The Encyclopedia of the Environment Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1994.

Stromberg v. California - Significance, Court Overturns Conviction Under "red Flag Law", Anarchistic Legislation: Red Flag Laws [next] [back] State of Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada - Significance, Supreme Court Redefines "separate But Equal"

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or