Raines v. Byrd
Significance, Political Ironies, Not A "case" Or "controversy", Counter-arguments In The Constitution And Coleman
Appellant
Frederick D. Raines, Director, U.S. Office of Management and Budget, et al.
Appellee
Senator Robert Byrd, et al.
Appellant's Claim
That appellees lacked standing to challenge the recently passed Line Item Veto Act.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Walter E. Dellinger, U.S. Solicitor General
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Alan Morrison
Justices for the Court
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter, Clarence Thomas
Justices Dissenting
Stephen Breyer, John Paul Stevens
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
26 June 1997
Decision
That the appellees lacked standing for their case under Article III, section II, of the Constitution, which authorizes the judicial branch to review only "cases" and "controversies." Since appellees could not "allege a personal injury that is particularized, concrete, and otherwise judicially cognizable," the case had to be vacated.
Related Cases
- The Pocket Veto Case, 279 U.S. 655 (1929).
- Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 433 (1939).
- Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486 (1969).
- Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737 (1984).
- Clinton v. City of New York, 188 S.Ct. 2091 (1998).
Additional topics
- Ray Lewis Trial: 2000 - Victims Stabbed During Brawl, The Case Against Ray Lewis, Prosecution's Murder Case Collapses
- Rae Carruth Trial: 2000-01 - A Promising Football Career Shattered, Cherica Adams Dies And Rae Carruth Flees, Recording Of 911 Call Is Played In Opening Statements
- Raines v. Byrd - Further Readings
- Raines v. Byrd - Significance
- Raines v. Byrd - Political Ironies
- Raines v. Byrd - Not A "case" Or "controversy"
- Raines v. Byrd - Counter-arguments In The Constitution And Coleman
- Raines v. Byrd - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1995 to Present